<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Matt Welch</title>
      <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:07:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Jim Lowney Remembers 9/11</b>: Some words from my great photographer pal Jim:<blockquote>

<strong>No Rocket Ships</strong>

 “Abbott and Costello Go to Mars” was always one of my favorites. As a kid growing up on the Jersey Shore somewhere between the New York and the Philly TV markets channel 11, WPIX, held a special place for me. After Mass on Sunday mornings, always at 11:30, the two funny guys from Jersey were ready to entertain 25 years after the fact.

So, Lou and Bud somehow accidentally steal a rocket ship. The plot and story don’t matter now. The scene is the two of them piloting the shining silver (I guess from the black and white film) rocket ship around New York City. The exchange, as best I remember, is classic in my head. It goes something like this:

“You got fifty cents?” asks Costello.

“Why?” asks Abbott.

“We’re about to go through the Lincoln Tunnel.”

Besides loving the joke, I love that even on this journey they somehow start from New Jersey in the middle of it all. I love the toll is only fifty cents.

They make it through the tunnel without a ticket from a Port Authority cop and zip all over Manhattan in their glimmering sliver rocket ship. I believe even the Statue of Liberty ducks down for them as they fly over her. It is grand fun all together.

As I climbed out of the station from the 6 train on a perfect Tuesday morning, September 11, 2010, and walked Canal Street east this massive jet went zooming passed before me down the Westside.

“Fuck, that thing is flying low,” I said to myself. It looked just like Abbott and Costello’s rocket ship. It was fast and shining in the morning sun.

When I got the next corner I looked to the left and saw it was in the North Tower.</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/09/05-week/#003183</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/09/05-week/#003183</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/beauty-beat/id368344954"><b>Oh Hey Look My Friend Dylan Has a Brand New Record Out and Why Don't You Go Buy it Or Something?</a></b>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/06/13-week/#003182</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/06/13-week/#003182</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:20:55 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/06/11/dont-you-go-calling-obama-an-e">Kevin Roderick Seconds Media Matters' Hysterical, Fact-Challenged Rant That, No Seriously, Was Headlined "Why does the <i>Los Angeles Times</i> hate Obama?"</a></b>: So, Media Matters writes <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201006100005">this goofy attack</a>, which is an embarrassment even for the shame-free field of media criticism, not least since it equates one political blogger with an entire newspaper, and misstates (while bragging that they didn't even <i>need</i> to do a Google search to confirm) that "when President Bush was in office, there was nobody on staff at the Times, and certainly nobody writing off the opinion pages, who was allowed to so casually insult the office of the presidency on a regular basis."

In response, I wrote <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/06/11/dont-you-go-calling-obama-an-e">this</a>. Former <i>Times</i>man and man-about-SoCal-media-criticism Kevin Roderick, on the other hand, has a <a href="http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2010/06/why_does_the_lat_employ_a.php">much different take</a>. Patrick "Patterico" Frey is closer to <a href="http://patterico.com/2010/06/10/eric-boehlert-why-does-the-los-angeles-times-hate-obama/">my point of view</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/06/13-week/#003181</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/06/13-week/#003181</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvwMQ9v7Ddo"><b>Snowmageddon Morning</b></a>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UvwMQ9v7Ddo&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UvwMQ9v7Ddo&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/01/31-week/#003180</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/01/31-week/#003180</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/12/why_this_decade.php?page=2"><b>It's Always Nice to Learn What I <i>Really</i> Meant, as Opposed to What I Really <i>Wrote</i></b></a>: Over at the <i>Village Voice</i>, Roy Edroso writes this <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/12/why_this_decade.php?page=2">strange history</a> of "warblogging":<blockquote>[W]ith the rush to war in Iraq came the phenomenon of "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warblog">warbloggers</a>" -- online belligerents who hollered for invasion and denounced all foot-draggers as traitors. They thought themselves a new breed of patriot, rescuing the nation from post-Vietnam drift, but were merely a useful feeder stream for a new jingoism that enmeshed America in foreign morasses wherein we remain hopelessly bound today.

One of the warblogs OGs, Matt Welch, looked back in 2006 on those heady times and reflected, "<a href="http://reason.com/archives/2006/04/01/farewell-to-warblogging">Man, was I wrong</a>." Nonetheless he admitted, "I can't shake the feeling of nostalgia for a promising cross-partisan moment that just fizzled away." By "cross-partisan," of course, he meant that some people joined his bellowing who later grew hoarse and unsure; there were others who disagreed from the start, but they were disregarded, because they were not part of the great new blog thing.</blockquote>I've got no issue with anyone flinging well-deserved poo at a category of human I indeed helped give name to. But read that squib without clicking on the links and you'd think that warblogging became a phenomenon in 2003, that I was one of those hollering for war against Iraq, and that my mea culpa was a direct reference to this pro-war belligerence. All are false.

"Warblogging" came to prominence not during the run-up to the Iraq War, but in the run-up to the <i>Afghanistan</i> War. In fact many early adopters of the term, me included, originally meant the phrase as much as anything as a sort of verbal slap in the face to describe what Islamic terrorists were already waging against <i>us</i>. It's a fair bet that James Wolcott, to name one of many presumably Edroso-approved examples, would not have found warblogs "<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20020601142409/http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0,1640,39413,FF.html">so damn addictive</a>" back in the spring of 2002 had they been primarily or even tertiarily organized around the concept of toppling Saddam Hussein.

Speaking of which, on that score I was <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/01/19-week/#1581">Hamlet</a>, not <a href="http://mattwelch.com/NatPostSave/coldwar.htm">Dick</a> <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2004/08/01/watergate-blowback">Cheney</a>. While you can say plenty <i>against</i> such punditorial indecisiveness, what you <i>can't</i> say (at least while pretending to care about the truth) is that it "denounced all foot-draggers as traitors." Here are <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/02/02-week/#1634">five</a> <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/02/02-week/#1622">mattwelch.com</a> <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/02/23-week/#1671">links</a> in <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/03/02-week/#1700">February/March</a> of <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2003/03/09-week/#1726">2003</a>: You make the call.

Why does Edroso go to such lengths in warping a record that's plenty rich enough for criticism? Unlike him, I won't pretend to go in the opposing corner's brain. Instead I will merely observe that all of the above bullshittery is in prelude to the remarkable claim about what I <i>really</i> meant in my <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2006/04/01/farewell-to-warblogging">Farewell to Warblogging</a> column, presented with the usual straight-from-the-arse tell of "of course." Namely, that I was lamenting "that some people" who "joined" my "bellowing" eventually "grew hoarse and unsure." 

Sounds like my wrath was aimed at liberal hawks who got wobbly! Uh, not fucking remotely:<blockquote>As a consumer, it was exponentially more edifying to me than the post-9/11 fumblings of the mainstream media's binary, Crossfire-style opinion slinging. "What do warbloggers have in common, that most pundits do not?" I enthused [in <a href="http://mattwelch.com/old/2001_12_09_archive.html#7891068">this December 2001 post</a>]. "I'd say a yen for critical thinking, a sense of humor that actually translates into people laughing out loud, a willingness to engage (and encourage) readers, a hostility to the Culture War and other artifacts of the professionalized left-right split of the 1990s...a readiness to admit error [and] a sense of collegial yet brutal peer review."

Man, was I wrong.

Michelle Malkin, to name one writer revered by warbloggers (her site recently won Best Blog in an annual poll organized by RightWingNews.com), is to critical thinking what Ralph Nader is to libertarianism—a very good example of the opposite. The basic scholarship of her 2004 book <i>In Defense of Internment</i> was cut to ribbons by Japanese-internment historian Eric L. Muller (see "Indefensible Internment," December 2004), yet many of the same people who once trumpeted bloggers' ability to "fact-check your ass" simply shrugged, continued treating Malkin as a trustworthy source, and saved their <i>real</i> journalism criticism for those partisan hacks at CBS News and <i>The New York Times</i>.</blockquote>It's fitting that Edroso's fantasia comes in the service of a column that attempts to affix blame for "ruin[ing] the Internet." The Internet ain't remotely ruined, and one of the main reasons why it isn't (and why certain grumps will grouse at the digital world passing them by) is that you can actually click through that hyperlink and discover that the writer talking so confidently is, in fact, full of shit.

<b>UPDATE</b>: Oh hey look, jackass saved the best for his <a href="http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2009_12_27_archive.html#2761376677284846603">personal site</a>:<blockquote>the warblogger era ('member that?), when alleged former liberals like <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=opmZQrBNPssC&pg=PA139&lpg=PA139&dq=%22former+liberal%22+%22warblogger%22&source=bl&ots=jcgH0VvmWU&sig=LUBJgct7Ep7S_LuL_asPtte4gaM&hl=en&ei=VZ49S7TYBIOHlAeGj-CjBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22former%20liberal%22%20%22warblogger%22&f=false">Matt Welch and Jeff Jarvis</a> would bellow that the scales had been torn from their eyes, revealing to them the necessity of invading Iraq. I notice that they're not similarly rallying to the call to invade Yemen, which suggests such epiphanies have a more limited shelf life than once was thought, as well as a longer, subsequent period of buyer's remorse.</blockquote>To sum up: Before the Iraq War, I wasn't sure what the U.S. should do, was respectful of differing views, and expressed both sentiments a half-dozen times on my "warblog." Through the sour lens of a <i>Village Voice</i> writer, that means I denounced fence-sitters (such as, um, myself?) as "traitors," disgorged several lifetimes' worth of pro-Iraq War "bellowing," then began a long, slow marination in my own regret.

Seriously, dude, at least <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2009/12/27/merry-christmas-mr-greenwald">Glenn Greenwald</a> knows how to use a basic search button. 

<b>UPDATE II</B>: Hey look again! Dude found the <a href="http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2010_01_03_archive.html#2259782845385744765">search button</a>! But instead of saying "Whoops! I was totally wrong about saying Welch bellowed support for the war and dismissed fence-sitters as traitors," he quotes a couple of my pacifist-bashing posts from September of 2001, grudgingly acknowledges that the "Farewell to Warblogging" column he so grossly mischaracterized "doesn't say much about the war part" (ya think, Roy?), makes comments throughout about how "angry" I am (honey, like Tom Petty, I'm laughing <i>all</i> the time), then finishes with this whimper:<blockquote>Nonetheless some people, including many less critical than me, got the impression the warbloggers supported some wars. So maybe "warblogging" was a misnomer all along, and they should have called it critical-thinkingblogging, or laughing-out-loudblogging. That might have cleared up some confusion, and spared us all some grief.</blockquote>Oh boo hoo. "Warblog" had <a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/warblog/archives/000140.html">long morphed</a> into an outsider term of derision as much as and probably more than an in-group identifier by the moment Edroso originally pegged as the advent of warblogging. As a would-be media critic, the onus is on him to figure out what the hell he's talking about.

<b>EXCITING UPDATE III!</B>: Another update from Edroso's latest post says, of my description of him spelunking through my September 2001 archives, "maybe he think's I'm cherry picking!" Not at all, Roy; there's a lot of harsh business in there, some that makes me wince in retrospect. What I <i>do</i> think you're doing is changing the subject from your utterly, laughably, provably false assertions about me "bellowing" support for invading Iraq by quoting from stuff I wrote 18 months before that war started (and just days after terrorists pulverized 3,000 people on American soil). You made multiple assertions about me that were false, a fact that no amount of post-9/11 Robert Jensen-bashing on my part has any relevance to. Keep on digging, though!

<b>AND THE FINAL UPDATE</B>: The <i>Village Voice</i> has run my <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/01/a_letter_of_com.php">letter</a>. Edroso, after admitting that his dating was wrong & that the pro-war stuff should not have been applied to me, then says this:<blockquote>Welch spent much of his early warblogging days (and some of his <a href="http://mattwelch.com/warblog/archives/001001.html">later ones</a>) beating up opponents of the war(s). ("<a href="http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2001/09/16-week/#3">I understand today -- really, for the first time in my life -- why for much of Middle America the word 'liberal' is a pejorative</a>," etc). I suppose you could say this is not the same thing as being an "advocate for war." I think it's a distinction without a difference.</blockquote>And there you have it. Spending my Sept. 16, 2001 criticizing Noam Chomsky for equating the massacre of five days earlier with Bill Clinton's bombing of a Sudanese pharmaceuticals factory, and Colman McCarthy for advocating that we react to the hijackers by saying "we forgive you," is no different than being an advocate for the Iraq War, even if I wasn't, um, an advocate for the Iraq War. Facts, schmacts, etc. I hope this has been as weirdly (if dully) illuminating for all of you as it has been for me.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/01/03-week/#003179</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2010/01/03-week/#003179</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:07:30 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0006C8WDY/ref=nosim/mattwelchsw02-20"><b>Written in 1973; Incident Discussed Is From 1962</b></a>:<blockquote>As a rule ballplayers and police get along remarkably well. Each knows that belting a girl around in a car is just clean, wholesome fun. The cop also knows the player can't stand having any such experience make the newspapers. [...]

Belinsky's cop was of a different breed. He was forced into action by the sight of the bleeding girl on the street. He took Bo, Dean [Chance], and the girl down to the imfirmary where the girl was sewn up and repaired.

The police were attempting to get the girl to sign a complain against Belinsky for assualt. She considered it and then told Bo, "I won't sign if you promise to stay with me all week."

Belinsky thought discretion was the better part of valor, so he agreed to her untenable demands.

"You think she showed any gratitude?" said Bo. "Hell, no. Three months later she gets a smart attorney and sues me in a civil action for one hundred and fifty thousand dollars. My lawyer had to give her a few bucks to get her out of town and shut her up. You just can't trust broads."</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/12/06-week/#003178</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/12/06-week/#003178</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:58:26 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Bo Knows Queens</b>:<blockquote>"I don't even know how it came about, but I got a date with Queen Soraya of Iran. I think it was after her marriage with the Shah had busted up and she was trying to make it in the movies or something. She was nice but she was a little weird. She was into all that mystical stuff, witchcraft, everything far out. She had blown her crown because she didn't have a son for the Shah, and now she was asking the witches for all the answers. But really a nice broadie."</blockquote>-- Bo Belinsky, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0006C8WDY/ref=nosim/mattwelchsw02-20"><i>Bo: Pitching and Wooing</i></a>, by Maury Allen.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/12/06-week/#003177</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/12/06-week/#003177</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:43:57 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0g2s7UdwGE"><b>Mere Mortals "Heart Burn Heart"</b></a>: During the first half of my tenure in L.A. I was occasionally called on to be an emergency fill-in bass player for various friends' bands. This was kind of funny, because I'd never really played bass before, aside from one disco-punk show in the '80s that I'm sure we'll get to next week. Bass is very easy to play adequately, nearly impossible to play well. Once you are good enough to learn what the instrument is supposed to do, that's when you get sad, because you probably aren't good enough to do it, and even if you were, you probably don't play with a good enough drummer, unless his name is "Coulter." 

Anyway, the longest of these bass stints was for Dylan Callaghan's rock band Champion. Dylan somehow found a very special London, Germany vampire robot named Axel to play lead guitar. For a while there -- especially just after they finally fired me -- Champion was among the best bands in Hollywood. Then Dylan fired Axel and it all got pear-shaped, though as these things do it all turned out for the best. One way in which it turned out for the best is that Axel moved on to what he originally came to Hollywood for: Making his own special weird Brit-pop-death-love music, for the past few years in outfit called <a href="http://www.myspace.com/meremortals">The Mere Mortals</a>. Did you know the Mortals are going on tour with <a href="http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=2661419">Frank Black</a>? Now you do.

Here's Axel and the band with their latest video, "Heart Burn Heart":

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y0g2s7UdwGE&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y0g2s7UdwGE&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/09-week/#003176</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/09-week/#003176</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0omUqw1-5DQ"><b>Yes, That Is Sean Condron Playing the Banjo at the U.S. Ambassador's Residence in Nicaragua</b></a>: No, this was not the first thing you would have predicted from young Sean back in 1993, when he was the lead bassist for Matt Welch and the Froggy Peat. (You can hear both his bass & lead guitar stylings on our version of "<a href="http://mattwelch.com/music/purple_rain.mp3">Purple Rain</a>," from the early 1994 release <i>Slip Disko</i>.) Sean was better known in Prague for his lead-guitar heroics in the seminal, manic depressive expat grunge band Dope.

Condron's the kinda guy you might encounter in the New York subway playing the clawhammer banjo, or perhaps performing live with a punk rock circus. He is certainly either drunk or sober. Last I saw him, a few years back, we were a little snookered, and he put on some really fucking phenomenal 1930s-style jazz tracks that he'd been working on. Next thing you know he's, uh, on a goodwill grassroots music tour organized by the State Department? Why the hell not!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bVpzpuY3mjU&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bVpzpuY3mjU&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003174</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003174</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:28:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0omUqw1-5DQ"><b>Let's Put Up Videos of Dudes I Used to Play in Bands With!</b></a> That'll give this here website a reason to believe. Let's start with some grainy live footage of Stig Roar Husby, featuring the lead cock'o'walk stylings of Michael Lindsay, with whom I made one the the 1990s' very best unreleased 4-track records, the self-titled <i>Golden Penetrators</i>. Here they are, obviously, on Hungarian television:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0omUqw1-5DQ&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0omUqw1-5DQ&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003173</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003173</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:51:50 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Arbor Day</b>:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8pFyk6YqtX8&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_profilepage&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8pFyk6YqtX8&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_profilepage&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003172</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/08/02-week/#003172</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:10:34 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Ever Have an Obscure Song That Just Sticks to You, for Decades?</b> This is mine:

<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:mtvmusic.com:298965" width="320" height="271" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashVars="dist=http://www.veoh.com" allowFullScreen="true" AllowScriptAccess="always"></embed>
<div style="margin:0; text-align:center; width:320px;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10px;"><a style="color:#000000;" href="http://www.mtvmusic.com/squalls">Squalls</a> |<a style="color:#000000;" href="http://www.mtvmusic.com/">MTV Music</a></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/06/28-week/#003171</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/06/28-week/#003171</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>This Is Pretty Good, Right?</b>:

<object width="400" height="300"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5222227&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5222227&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="300"></embed></object><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5222227">Record Club: Velvet Underground & Nico 'Sunday Morning'</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/videotheque">Beck Hansen</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/06/28-week/#003170</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/06/28-week/#003170</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>I Have Written a Whole Bunch of Columns and Blog Posts About the California Special Election and its Aftermath</b>: So let's collect most of it in one place, in reverse chronological order, shall we? Starting with tonight:

<a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/133890.html">Blame the Voters, Pass the Buck</a>: <i>L.A. Times</i> writers who bemoan "feel-good 'ballot box budgeting'" ignore the paper's longstanding support for bond-measure politics. 

<a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/133807.html">Why Long Beach Isn't Detroit</a>: How Southern California survived the collapse of aircraft manufacturing without a bailout. <i>(Not technically about the special election, but somehow relevant.)</i>

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133879.html">Bailout Mentality 101</a>: How Michael Hiltzik's <i>Act or Die</i> mindset is all too common among the people who are supposed to be explaining this stuff.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133819.html">The $499,000 Pension and Other Tales of California Governance</a>: Why discuss gold-plated retirements when you can bemoan budget cuts that will "reshape" California?

<a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/133772.html">California's Silent Big Spenders</a>: Political class refuses to explain why the state requires hysterical spending growth.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133764.html"><i>LAT</i> Columnist: State Spending Problem a "Myth"...Unless You Count All State Spending</a>: Michael Hiltzik's curious math.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133700.html">Paul Krugman: If Only California Could Just Raise <i>Taxes</i></a>: Blaming tax restrictions, and a political minority, on a spending problem.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133683.html">The California Scare Campaign</a>: How "straight" news is tailored to maximally frighten your pants off.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133630.html">Why Governments Are Lousy at Running Businesses, But Excellent at Scaring You About "Annihilating" Budget Cuts</a>: In which "brutal budget cuts" mean 2 percent of the public sector workforce.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133626.html">Union Chief, to the California He Helped Drive Into the Ditch: "I think democracy is an ugly thing"</a>: SEIU chief Andy Stern doesn't even try to defend his takeover of Golden State politics.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133600.html">California's Political/Journalistic Class = Fail</a>: Though that doesn't stop them from snarling at voters the morning after.

<a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/133570.html">Defenders of Democracy Fail, Yet Again, to Convince the Polity</a>: Featuring a handy and stunning chart of California newspaper editorial endorsements.

Some of this will surely be repetitive and so on, but I wanted to gather all the coverage in once place.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/05/31-week/#003169</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/05/31-week/#003169</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Why Facebook Is Fun For a 40-year-old, in a That Way it Can't Be for a 20-year-old</b>: Because ha-ha, surprising old pictures you didn't know about and never expected to see!

For instance, not gay at all:

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?op=1&view=global&subj=542683032&pid=7817&id=1785938229"><img src="http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs098.snc1/4731_1005938287158_1785938229_7820_586816_n.jpg"/></a>

Also, not drunk:

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?op=2&view=global&subj=542683032&pid=6599937&id=822715499"><img src="http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs029.snc1/3173_187338675499_822715499_6600554_5095128_n.jpg"/></a>

Not a hippie:

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?op=3&view=global&subj=542683032&pid=30355783&id=1108497238&oid=9043869395"><img src="http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs036.snc1/2415_1103502903631_1108497238_30355749_1113605_n.jpg"/></a>

Not looking down Bonnie Cooper's shirt:

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?op=4&view=global&subj=542683032&pid=1952257&id=668621978&oid=39299704235"><img src="http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2328/247/24/1350530272/n1350530272_30249686_524.jpg"/></a>

And ... just not:

<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?op=8&view=global&subj=542683032&pid=413064&id=737369259&oid=9043869395"><img src="http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-sf2p/v231/229/71/737369259/n737369259_413102_8017.jpg"/></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/05/31-week/#003168</link>
         <guid>http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2009/05/31-week/#003168</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
